We keep the process transparent so editors know what to expect at each stage, where their input matters, and how long verification steps usually take.
You send the article draft, video script, or newsletter copy along with any source links. We confirm the scope, the claims to check, and the deadline before any work starts.
Each claim is matched against primary documents, official records, and reputable coverage. We flag gaps where the evidence is thin or the source chain is unclear.
Our editors run the claim-by-claim check, scoring each source for credibility and noting where language needs tightening. You receive a marked-up copy with suggested rewrites.
You review the findings, accept or dispute individual checks, and ask for additional context on any item. This is the point where your editorial judgment shapes the final call.
You get a clean summary of what was verified, what was changed, and what remains unresolved. The report stays on file for future reference and audit trails.
If a reader questions a fact after publication, we revisit the original check and provide a written response you can share. This keeps the record consistent across channels.
Our editorial support team is available Monday through Friday, 9:00 to 18:00 IST. We respond to verification workflow questions within one business day, and urgent production issues get a same-day reply. For common questions about source scoring or claim tracking, check the FAQ page first.
What you can expect from our editorial process
Your team moves from raw claim to verified note in fewer steps, because the workflow is built around your existing production rhythm, not a separate tool to learn.
Editors stop guessing which sources deserve a second look. The scoring framework gives you a shared language for credibility, so debates become shorter and more productive.
Claim tracking catches problems before a piece goes to layout. You spend less time patching copy after the fact and more time shaping the story you actually want to tell.
Sentiment data is delivered in the context of a specific article or segment, so you can see what resonated and adjust the next assignment without waiting for a monthly report.
Editorial planning is tied to your actual output targets, whether that is three daily articles or a weekly newsletter. The templates adapt to your cadence, not the other way around.
Workshops are built around your team's real cases, so the verification habits you practice in the session are the same ones you use on the next assignment.